Consultation on education and training approval standards for best interests assessors
This consultation relates to the role of the best interests assessor (BIA).
Consultation on education and training approval standards for best interests assessors
This consultation relates to the role of the best interests assessor (BIA)
This consultation has now closed. We're currently evaluating your responses and will share more information at a later date.
Contents
- Introduction
- About the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and the BIA role
- About the standards
- How to respond
- What happens next
- Summary of consultation questions
- Our proposed standards for best interests assessor (BIA) course approval (2023)
- Annex 1: The 6 BIA capabilities
Introduction
Social Work England sets and upholds the professional standards for all social workers in England. We also approve training for certain advanced practice roles and include these roles as annotations on our register. One of these areas is mental capacity, and we are now consulting on a new set of standards which we will use to approve and reapprove courses leading to the specialist award of best interests assessor (BIA).
The standards that we are consulting on set out our expectations for what courses need to do to be sure those who qualify from them can practise as a safe and effective BIA.
About the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and the BIA role
The Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) are the legal framework that protects the rights of people who have been deprived of their liberty. They ensure that such deprivations are lawful when the person in question does not have the mental capacity to challenge them or to indicate their consent.
Broadly speaking, in order for a care home or hospital to deprive someone of their liberty, they must apply to the local authority (council) for authorisation. The council must then undertake a number of assessments, including an assessment undertaken by a best interests assessor (‘BIA’). The law [1] sets out criteria that the people carrying out these assessments must meet. One of these criteria is that they must hold a BIA qualification, and courses which lead to this qualification must follow these standards.
[note 1] The The Mental Capacity (Deprivation of Liberty: Standard Authorisations, Assessments and Ordinary Residence) Regulations 2008
About the standards
Why are we introducing the standards?
To become a BIA, you need to be registered in any of these 4 professions:
- social worker (registered with Social Work England)
- first level nurse (registered with the Nursing and Midwifery Council)
- occupational therapist or psychologist (registered with the Health and Care Professions Council)
The training to become a BIA is the same regardless of the person’s regulated profession. To ensure consistency of oversight, Social Work England is named in law as the regulator for this training.
Why are we introducing them now?
In 2019, new legislation established Social Work England as a new professional regulator and this gave us responsibility for setting standards for BIA courses, and approving and reapproving them against these standards.
In December 2019 we began reviewing the current standards but during this time new legislation had been introduced to replace DoLS and the BIA role with the Liberty Protection Safeguards (LPS). The LPS outlined that the BIA role would have been replaced with the new approved mental capacity professional (AMCP) role. It was expected these changes would come into effect before the end of 2020.
We agreed that it would be disproportionate for us to consult on, introduce and implement a new set of standards for BIA courses given that the expected lifespan of these courses was no longer than 12 months. As a result, we agreed that we would approve any new BIA courses against the standards in place since 2009. However, no new courses have been established since 2019, so we have not approved any new courses.
In early 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic began to have severe operational impacts on the health and care system as well as the legislative process. The introduction of the LPS was delayed and it was neither practical nor proportionate to introduce new BIA standards instead at that time.
Following a series of delays, the Government announced in April 2023 that it would now postpone the replacement of DoLS with LPS until the next Parliament. This means that we can reasonably expect DoLS to remain in place for a minimum of eighteen months.
This delay has increased the likelihood that education and training providers will seek approval for courses in order to increase the supply of available BIAs. We are now proposing to introduce new education and training standards which we can use to approve and reapprove BIA courses for the foreseeable future.
How did we develop the standards?
In 2022 we consulted on the education and training standards for the new approved mental capacity professional (AMCP) role which was intended to replace the BIA role.
Before and during the consultation, we engaged with a range of stakeholders including:
- training providers
- BIAs
- social workers
- people with lived and learned experience
- our National Advisory Forum
We received lots of feedback from a wide range of stakeholders which we incorporated into the final version of the AMCP education and training standards.
Because AMCPs and BIAs cover similar areas of work we have not repeated this pre-consultation engagement. Instead, we based our proposed BIA education and training standards on the feedback we previously received, adapting them to reflect the differences between the roles.
We also determined that the 6 key competencies for best interests assessors (published by the College of Social Work in 2013) remained a useful basis for curriculum development and were already the basis for courses previously developed and approved.
We have annexed these capabilities to the standards, so that they can fulfil the same role for BIAs as schedule 2 of the Mental Health (Approved Mental Health Professional) (Approval) Regulations 2008 does for AMHPs – that is, they set out the baseline competency requirements that BIAs should be able to meet when they qualify. They provide helpful, robust and tested guidance which will help course providers design their course curricula.
How to respond to the consultation
This consultation closed on 26 October 2023. Thank you for your responses.
What happens next?
Once the consultation closes on Thursday 26 October, we will collate, read and analyse all the responses. We will read and consider all the feedback, and we will review and make changes to our proposals in response to this. We will publish a summary of the feedback received and the changes we have made alongside the revised education and training standards for BIAs.
The revised standards will then be reviewed by the government and final approval on these will need to be granted by the Secretary of State. Once we have final approval on the standards we can confirm the date we expect the standards to come into effect. We expect the new standards will be introduced in early 2024. We will then be in contact with providers to discuss arrangements for reapproval of existing courses.
Summary of consultation questions
Question 1
To what extent do you agree that the standards accurately reflect the requirements of the role of best interests assessor (BIA)?
Question 2
In relation to standard 1, to what extent do you think the language reflects what an applicant should be able to demonstrate upon admission to the course?
Question 3
Do you think the relationship between the standards and the 6 capabilities set out in the annex is clear? What changes could we make to ensure the link between the two, and the reason for the inclusion of the 6 capabilities, is sufficiently robust and can inform course design and delivery?
Question 4
What updates or amendments would you suggest that we make to the 6 capabilities in Annex 1, and why?
Question 5
Is there anything in the standards that you don’t understand?
Question 6
Do you have any other comments on any part of the standards?
Question 7
Do you think that these standards could impact any persons with a protected characteristic?
If so, is it positively, or negatively, and how?
The Equality Act (2010) lists 9 protected characteristics: age, disability, gender reassignment, race, religion or belief, sex, sexual orientation, marriage and civil partnership and pregnancy and maternity.
Question 8
How did you hear about this consultation?
Question 9
Do you have any feedback on the consultation process or any other comments?
Our proposed standards for best interests assessor (BIA) course approval (2023)
These are the standards by which Social Work England will use to approve, monitor and reapprove courses qualifying a professional to act as a best interests assessor (BIA). Standards are criteria by which we will assess whether a course should be approved to offer, or continue to offer, BIA training.
You should read these standards alongside the following documents:
- The Mental Capacity (Deprivation of Liberty: Standard Authorisations, Assessments and Ordinary Residence) Regulations 2008 (referred to in this document as the ‘BIA regulations’)
- any additional Social Work England standards or guidance for these standards, or for relevant specialist practice
Definitions and terms
Relevant qualified professionals
Any of the professionals listed as eligible for approval by a local authority in England to act on their behalf as a BIA under the BIA regulations. They must be registered with the relevant regulatory body. Relevant qualified professionals are:
- social workers (registered with Social Work England)
- practising psychologists (registered with the Health and Care Professions Council, and listed in the British Psychological Society’s Register of Chartered Psychologists)
- first level nurses (registered with the Nursing and Midwifery Council)
- occupational therapists (registered with the Health and Care Professions Council)
Relevant regulatory body
Any regulatory body mentioned in the BIA regulations as being responsible for the professional registration of those eligible for approval as a BIA.
- Health and Care Professions Council
- Nursing and Midwifery Council
- Social Work England
People with lived experience
We recognise that different regulators and professions use different terms to describe the people that their professionals seek to support, together with their carers. For example, ‘patient’ or ’service user’. As these standards are the statutory responsibility of Social Work England, we have used the term ‘people with lived experience’, which includes carers, to cover this.
Student
We have used the term ‘student’ throughout this document. We use this to mean anyone learning, studying or training on a course approved by us for qualifying as a BIA. The term includes trainees, apprentices and practitioners in training or work-based learning and applies to all relevant qualified professionals regardless of their regulatory body.
The standards
Standard 1: Admissions
1. Education and training providers will:
- 1.1. Confirm on entry to the course that applicants have:
-
i. the potential to develop the knowledge and skills necessary to meet the 6 BIA capabilities set out in Annex 1 of these standards
-
ii. the potential to meet the eligibility criteria for the role set out in the relevant legislation governing BIA practice [2]
-
iii. the capability to use information and communication technology (ICT) methods and techniques to achieve course outcomes
-
- 1.2. Confirm thaat applicants are and remain fully registered with a relevant regulatory body in line with the relevant regulations.
- 1.3. Confirm that applicants have, and can demonstrate, suitable prior experience of the practical application of appropriate legislation and policy, specifically including but not limited to mental capacity, mental health and human rights legislation, and demonstrable experience of understanding risk in relation to these.
- 1.4. Confirm that applicants have a robust level of legal literacy in appropriate legislative and policy areas.
- 1.5. Confirm that applicants can demonstrate a commitment to anti-racist, anti-discriminatory and anti-oppressive practice.
- 1.6. Ensure that employers, placement providers, and people with lived experience are involved in admissions processes.
- 1.7. Ensure that the admissions processes assess the suitability of applicants, including in relation to their conduct, health and character. This includes appropriate criminal conviction checks.
- 1.8. Ensure that there are equality, diversity and inclusion policies in relation to applicants and that they are implemented and monitored.
- 1.9. Ensure that the admissions process gives applicants the information they require to make an informed choice about whether to take up a place. This will include information about the award level and professional qualification, course content, teaching modes, location of study, assessment methods, duration, and observation requirements including the expectations around arranging or securing observation opportunities.
[note 2] The Mental Capacity (Deprivation of Liberty: Standard Authorisations, Assessments and Ordinary Residence) Regulations 2008
Standard 2: Course governance, management and quality
2. Education and training providers will:
- 2.1. Ensure courses are supported by a management and governance plan that includes the roles, responsibilities and lines of accountability of individuals and governing groups in the delivering, resourcing and managing the quality of the course.
- 2.2. Ensure that effective monitoring, evaluation and improvement systems are in place, and that these involve employers, people with relevant lived experience including carers, and students.
- 2.3. Ensure that student admissions are aligned to a clear strategy, which includes consideration of:
- i. local and regional capacity for observation opportunities; and
- ii. the availability of part-time or other flexible course arrangements to widen access wherever possible
- 2.4. Ensure that the person with overall professional responsibility for the course is a relevant qualified professional (social worker, occupational therapist, psychologist or nurse) with appropriate experience.
- 2.5. Ensure that there is adequate provision of appropriately qualified and experienced staff.
- 2.6. Ensure that educators are supported to maintain their knowledge and understanding in relation to mental capacity, mental health and human rights legislation and policy, including recent developments, and the practical application of this via the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards, including giving support to undertake continuing professional development relevant to their role.
- 2.7. Ensure that students have the opportunity to provide feedback about the course and that this feedback is analysed and used to inform the management and development of the course.
Standard 3: Learning environment
3. Education and training providers will:
- 3.1. Ensure that the content, structure and delivery of the training is in accordance with relevant guidance and frameworks and is designed to enable students to demonstrate that they have the required knowledge and skills, including around cross-national border issues in relation to practice in Wales, where this is appropriate.
- 3.2. Ensure that each student has the opportunity to undertake a minimum of 2 practice observation opportunities which:
- i. enables the student to shadow a BIA assessment
- ii. provide practice experience that can be applied to a variety of settings and types of responsible body
- iii. is overseen by a suitably qualified and experienced relevant qualified professional who has relevant and current knowledge, skills and experience to support safe and effective practice
- iv. enables the student to produce a detailed analysis of relevant practice issues which forms part of the student’s overall assessment
- 3.3. Ensure that the number, duration and range of observation opportunities is appropriate to support the delivery of the course and the achievement of the learning outcomes.
- 3.4. Maintain clear collaborative arrangements for planning and communication with providers including a thorough and effective system for approving and monitoring all observation opportunities.
Standard 4: Curriculum and assessment
4. Education and training providers will:
- 4.1. Ensure that the content, structure and delivery of the training is in accordance with relevant guidance and frameworks and is designed to enable students to demonstrate that they have the necessary knowledge and skills to meet the requirements of the role as set out in the 6 BIA capabilities set out at Annex 1.
- 4.2. Ensure that the views of employers, practitioners and people with lived experience of social work are incorporated into the design, ongoing development and review of the curriculum.
- 4.3. Ensure that the course is designed in accordance with equality, diversity and inclusion principles, and fully aligned with and informed by mental capacity, human rights, and mental health legislation and the principles of anti-discriminatory and anti-racist practice.
- 4.4. Ensure that the course is continually updated as a result of developments in research, legislation, government policy, best practice, and case law.
- 4.5. Ensure that the integration of policy, legal literacy and practice is central to the course.
- 4.6. Ensure that the number of hours spent in structured academic learning under the direction of an educator is sufficient to ensure that students meet the required level of competence.
- 4.7. Provide staff involved in leading and delivering the training with sufficient protected training time to keep their own practice and knowledge up to date in line with statutory and regulatory requirements.
- 4.8. Ensure that assessments are robust, fair, reliable and valid, and that those who successfully complete the course have developed the knowledge and skills necessary to make robust, independent and well-evidenced assessments in the best interests of the person. This should include regular monitoring and evaluation of assessment standards to ensure that they remain robust and reliable.
- 4.9. Ensure students are provided with feedback throughout the course to support their ongoing development.
- 4.10. Ensure that the course is designed to enable students to develop an evidence-informed approach to assessment and evaluation, underpinned by skills, knowledge and an ability to interpret and respond appropriately to legislative and policy change and case law.
- 4.11. Ensure that the course equips students with knowledge and skills in relation to identifying and mediating conflict between individuals, families and agencies to support a robust, independent and well-evidenced determination in the best interests of the person.
- 4.12. Clearly specify requirements for student progression and achievement within the course.
- 4.13. Clearly specify that any equivalent award which may be made will not lead to eligibility to be approved as a BIA.
- 4.14. Clearly specify a process for the appointment of at least 1 external examiner who must be an appropriately experienced and relevant qualified professional.
Standard 5: Supporting students
5. Education and training providers will:
- 5.1. Ensure that students have access to resources to support their health and wellbeing including confidential counselling services. The course must also equip students to understand the potential impact of BIA practice on their own emotional and mental wellbeing, and the importance of identifying ways to handle this impact.
- 5.2. Ensure that students have access to a system of academic and pastoral support for their progression, development and welfare.
- 5.3. Ensure that there is a thorough and effective process for ensuring the ongoing suitability of students’ conduct, character and health.
- 5.4. Make reasonable adjustments for students with health conditions or impairments to enable them to progress through their course and meet the specialist standards, in accordance with relevant legislation.
- 5.5. Provide timely information to students about their curriculum, observation requirements, assessments, and implications for their continuing practice, including arrangements for annotation of the register and requirements for periodic refresher training.
- 5.6. Ensure that students are able to draw links between the completion of their BIA course and ongoing refresher training, and the ongoing requirements of their professional registration such as continuing professional development.
- 5.7. Provide timely and meaningful feedback to students on their progression and performance in assessments.
- 5.8. Ensure there is an effective process in place for students to make academic appeals.
- 5.9. Ensure that policies and processes, including for whistleblowing, are in place for students to challenge unsafe behaviours and cultures and organisational wrongdoing, and report concerns openly and safely without fear of adverse consequences.
Annex 1: The 6 BIA capabilities
1. The ability to apply in practice, and maintain knowledge of, relevant legal and policy frameworks
1.1. A working knowledge of:
- (i) Mental capacity legislation and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), their related codes of practice, national and local policy guidance
- (ii) Relevant parts of other legislation, codes of practice, national and local policy guidance, in particular the Human Rights Act 1998, the Mental Health Acts (MHA) 1983 and 2007, and law/policy related to Adult Safeguarding
- (iii) Relevant case law and its application in practice
- (iv) The developing concept of deprivation of liberty
- (vi) The legal position and accountability of DoLS/BIAs in relation to the MCA, any employing organisation and the authority on whose behalf they are acting
1.2. The ability to:
- (i) Base DoLS/BIA practice on a critical evaluation of a range of case law and research relevant to evidence-based practice
- (ii) Provide a clearly evidenced, written rationale of the process including where relevant information on differences of opinion, and how information has been analysed and used to reach an evidence-informed professional opinion
- (iii) Analyse and critically reflect on personal practice in order to identify achievements and opportunities for further development
- (iv) Exercise the appropriate use of independence, authority and autonomy and use it to inform their future practice as a BIA
- (v) Work within their area of competence, seeking further advice as appropriate
- (vi) Assert a social perspective and make properly informed independent decisions in tight timescales
2. The ability to work in a manner congruent with the presumption of capacity
2.1. An understanding of:
- (i) The Human Rights Act in particular the basic rights to personal autonomy, choice, privacy, liberty and self-determination, providing challenge to others where needed
- (ii) The formal two-stage assessment of capacity
- (iii) Advance decisions and lasting powers of attorney including in relation to refusing life sustaining treatment
- (iv) The role of the relevant person’s representative, and the role of the relevant person in choosing their representative
2.2. The ability to:
- (i) Competently assess capacity in complex cases, seeking other evidence as appropriate
- (ii) Understand and respond sensitively to, issues of race, faith, belief, disability, age, sexuality and culture in carrying out DoLS assessments
- (iii) Consult sensitively all those with an interest in the person’s welfare, and sustain engagement in circumstances where there is hostility or risk
- (iv) Reflect on the influence and impact of their own values on professional practice
- (v) Appropriately identify legally appointed decision makers such as attorneys and court appointed deputies, and assess whether advance decisions are valid and applicable
- (vi) The ability to promote the rights, dignity and self-determination of the relevant person consistent with their own needs and wishes, to enable them to contribute to the decisions made affecting their quality of life and liberty
3. The ability to take all practical steps to help someone make a decision
3.1. An understanding of:
- (i) The impact of mental disorder on mental capacity, including the effect of social, physical and developmental factors on a person’s ability to make decisions
- (ii) The social impact of the disability or condition, how this impacts on the relevant person, the family, carers, and the decision making process
- (iii) The role of the Independent Mental Capacity Advocate (IMCA) within the DoLS process, and the circumstances in which an IMCA should be appointed
- (iv) A variety of forms of communication, including communication aids and tools and the impact on the relevant person of communicating at different times of the day and in different locations
3.2. The ability to:
- (i) Communicate skillfully and confidently in the context of a DoLS assessment
- (ii) Utilise a range of approaches to sustain engagement with people whose capacity and ability to communicate may fluctuate, or be very limited
- (iii) Enable the person to contribute to the decision making process as far as is possible given the circumstances of the case
- (iv) Support people through a complex assessment process within the framework of the MCA including interviewing the person, their relatives and staff and identifying and appointing the relevant person’s representative
4. The ability to balance a person’s right to autonomy and self-determination with their right to safety, and respond proportionately
4.1. An understanding of:
- (i) The MCA in relation to the impact of unwise decisions
- (ii) The links between the MCA/DoLS, the MHA and the protection of adults at risk of abuse within the wider need to recognise people’s right to autonomy
- (iii) The impact of coercion and power imbalances on people’s abilities to make informed decisions
4.2. The ability to:
- (i) Carry out work with individuals that is person centred and promotes choice and autonomy, while considering issues of risks and proportionality
- (ii) Be alert for the need for assessment under the MHA where relevant persons are ineligible for DoLS
- (iii) Make appropriate safeguarding referrals
5. The ability to make informed, independent best interest decisions within the context of a Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) assessment
5.1. An understanding of:
- (i) What constitutes ‘best interests’, as set out within the MCA, codes of practice and case law
- (ii) The DoLS assessment process including the role of the Mental Health Assessor and IMCA
- (iii) The implications of a range of treatments and interventions applicable to the relevant person’s situation
- (iv) The recommendations a BIA can make in relation to deprivation of liberty
5.2. The ability to:
- (i) Articulate the DoLS process and the BIA’s role within the assessment process
- (ii) Determine whether:
- (a) a deprivation of liberty is occurring
- (b) the deprivation is in the person’s best interests using the section 4 checklist
- (c) the person meets the requirements for age, no refusals, mental capacity and eligibility if appropriate
- (iii) Make appropriate recommendations on:
- (a) conditions attached to the authorisation, and (b) duration of the authorisation
- (iv) Formally record assessments to a high professional standard likely to withstand legal scrutiny, demonstrating the ability to analyse and evaluate complex information; to provide evidence for decision making including the rationale for the timescale recommended for any deprivation of liberty
- (v) Consult the Mental Health Assessor, and IMCA if appointed, and document and examine their views in the written decision making process
6. The ability to effectively assess risk in complex situations, and use analysis to make proportionate decisions
6.1. An understanding of:
- (i) Risk, how to assess risk, likelihood and seriousness of risk, proportionate responses to managing risk
- (ii) The benefits of positive risk taking
6.2. An ability to:
- (i) Weigh up the pros and cons of the different options in the light of best interests and risk assessment
- (ii) Identify risk, and consider its management in a less restrictive manner (if possible) to arrive at a proportionate outcome
- (iii) Evidence in their report an analysis of risk
including proportionality and the actual likelihood of harm - (iv) Take action when an application to the Court of Protection is needed
- (v) Challenge risk averse practice